General: Supervisor Selection   with Structured Interview

for Suzanne Example

4/15/2003

Introduction
Competency Overview
Ability Results
Personality Detail
Interview Guide
Making the Selection Decision
Management Suggestions
Graphic Profile


Copyright 2003 Bigby, Havis & Associates, Inc. and David G. Bigby, Ph.D. All rights reserved.
 
 


INTRODUCTION
Suzanne Example
General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

 
Confidentiality

Because of the nature of appraisal information and the dangers of its misuse, this report must be kept confidential and its contents restricted to those who have direct responsibility for decision making. This Selection Report should not be shown to or discussed with the candidate. The ASSESS Developmental Report has been designed for this purpose.

     
    How To Use This Report

    • Since everyone has strengths and weaknesses, special caution must be exercised to view this report as a whole. Be careful not to overemphasize specific statements, but rather consider this person's overall suitability for a particular position in your organizational environment.

    • Many of the characteristics described in this report could be assets in some circumstances and liabilities in others. You will notice that a characteristic may appear as a strength in relation to one competency, but a weakness when considered in relation to another competency.

    • The report does not take into account the candidate's background, training, or technical skills or experience. Therefore, the results do not measure personal effectiveness or the quality of job performance; rather, they describe characteristics that (along with these other factors) may influence job performance. To minimize the chances of erroneous decisions, the contents of this report should be combined with information from other sources (for example; interview impressions, references, work experience, job competence, work habits, background, etc.) to gain a complete picture of this person.

    • Over time, people and organizations change. If several years have passed since the date of this report, it may be valuable to reassess the candidate. Remember, this person was evaluated at a particular age, stage of development, level of experience, etc. With the passage of time, the characteristics measured by ASSESS may have changed.

     
    Interpretation Assistance

    ASSESS is a computerized expert system that interprets test scores and writes reports for our clients in the same manner that Bigby, Havis & Associates psychologists would. The reports are designed to be read by managers without regular assistance from a professional. Occasionally, however, you may need additional interpretation assistance. See the ASSESS coordinator for your organization to make arrangements.

       
      Feedback to the Individual

      Developmental Report: In addition to the Selection Report, a Developmental report is available. It is designed to be given directly to the individual and provides constructive feedback on test results, specific developmental suggestions, and a guide for writing a personalized developmental plan.


        COMPETENCY OVERVIEW
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Your company has identified a set of competencies important to job success.

        Competency in an area is the result of many factors working together, which include innate characteristics (natural ability, personality) and learned characteristics (knowledge, experience and skills) as is presented in the following chart. People who have the right competencies or who have a good potential for developing these competencies will be able to do the right things (behaviors) to produce the desired results (effective outcomes).

        The ASSESS system has evaluated this candidate's work related personality and abilities (if ability tests were administered) in relation to the Competency Model described on the following pages.

        The following report provides detailed results and judgments about how these innate characteristics may facilitate or hinder the display or development of the desired competencies and, ultimately, job effectiveness. Also provided is a competency-oriented interview protocol to use to evaluate the skills, knowledge and other learned characteristics important to this job, as well as a general model for making a good decision from all sources of information.

         
        I N N A T E L E A R N E D
        Natural Ability /
        Potential
        Personal
        Characteristics
        Knowledge /
        Experience
        Skills / Learned
        Abilities





        C O M P E T E N C I E S

        B E H A V I O R S
        E F F E C T I V E   O U T C O M E S

         

        ABILITY RESULTS
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Since abilities can impact most competencies, they are reported separately here.

        The following results are based on your performance on standardized ability tests. They are presented as percentile comparisons to professional norms (people who, for the most part, have an education at or beyond the college undergraduate level) and to general population norms (people who, for the most part, have a high school education).

        With a few exceptions, if this person is being considered for a position normally requiring a college degree, you should pay most attention to the professional norm group comparisons. However, if the candidate has limited formal education or if a college degree is not required, the general population comparisons may be more appropriate.
        The candidate completed the following ability test(s):

        • The Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness is a measure of her language skills and her quantitative skills. It also provides an indication of her ability to shift quickly back and forth from one problem type to another.

        • The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is a measure of her ability to analyze complex, multifaceted written information and to draw accurate conclusions. This capacity includes the ability to evaluate information and to recognize assumptions, facts, and situations where there is not enough information to arrive at a valid conclusion.

        • The Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (Abstract Reasoning) is a measure of her ability to reason through complex, abstract, nonverbal information and to grasp new ideas. This capacity includes the ability to solve problems in new situations where one has little experience upon which to draw.
        Intellectual Ability Scores Compared to: 

         General Population Norms:   0%   100%
        Mental Alertness      
        Critical Thinking      
        Abstract Reasoning      
         Professional Norms:        
        Mental Alertness      
        Critical Thinking      
        Abstract Reasoning      

         

        Comments: While she should be able to reason through verbal and quantitative information to solve problems as quickly or more quickly than the average person, she may be somewhat slower or less skilled than the typical professional.

        Her critical thinking abilities appear to be as good as the typical professional and better than the average person. She should be able to understand most complex written problems, evaluate the relative merits of various interpretations of the information presented, and come to sound conclusions.

        She should have little difficulty solving problems that involve complex, abstract information. She should also be quick to grasp new ideas and solve problems that are outside her usual experience.

         
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

        General: Supervisor

        Decisive Judgment Making good decisions in a timely and confident manner.
        Adapting To Change Adapting to changing situations and restructuring tasks and priorities as changes occur within the business and organization.
        Planning And Organizing Effectively organizing and planning work according to organizational needs by defining objectives and anticipating needs and priorities.
        Driving For Results Challenging, pushing the organization and themselves to excel and achieve.
        Managing Others Directing and leading others to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
        Coaching And Developing Others Advising, assisting, mentoring and providing feedback to others to encourage and inspire the development of work-related competencies and long-term career growth.
        Motivating Others Inspiring others to perform well by actively conveying enthusiasm and a passion for doing a good job.
        Functional Acumen* Having the skills, knowledge and abilities necessary to be effective in the specific functional content of a job.
        Integrity* Upholding a high standard of fairness and ethics in everyday words and actions.


        *Competencies not strongly impacted by the personality characteristics measured by ASSESS.  Development feedback and suggestions may be obtained for these competencies using the Assess360 system.


        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Reading The Competency Graphs:
        • For each personality characteristic, a distribution of possible scores (from less to more) is displayed in deciles (1-10% = 1st decile, 11-20% = 2nd decile, etc.) using ten graph blocks.

        • This distribution is based on a professional norm group of approximately 40,000 respondents.

        • The candidate's score on each personality characteristic is represented by the graphic character .

        • Overlaid on the normative distribution, the colors and shading on the graph represent desirable and undesirable ranges on each characteristic for a particular competency.

        • Ranges in which a characteristic may hinder are marked with least shading ( ).

        • Ranges in which a characteristic may be a potential concern are marked in intermediate shading ( ).

        • Ranges in which a characteristic may help are marked with most shading ( ).

        • You will notice from the pattern of shadings that low scores are not necessarily bad and high scores are not necessarily good.

        • Also notice that the Helps and Hinders ranges for a characteristic may differ by competency. For example, a higher level of assertiveness may be more desirable for one competency than another.
         
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Decisive Judgment

        Making good decisions in a timely and confident manner.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Decisive Judgment

        Fact-Based  
        Realistic  
        Serious-Minded, Restrained  
        Self-Reliance  
        Assertiveness  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • Her fact-based orientation should lead her to analyze data and objective information before drawing conclusions.

      • She is self-reliant and should be comfortable making decisions on her own. She should be willing to take responsibility for important decisions rather than relying excessively on others for support or guidance.

      • Her assertive style will help her to confidently convince others of the reasons for and merits of her decisions.
      •   Hinders

      • Highly practical in her thinking, she may overrely on past solutions rather than look for a new or different approach.

      • Her low level of restraint may lead her to react without sufficiently deliberating the consequences or potential outcomes of her decisions.
      • Her assertive style may allow her to convince others of her decisions, even when they are poorly thought out.

         
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Adapting To Change

        Adapting to changing situations and restructuring tasks and priorities as changes occur within the business and organization.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Adapting To Change

        Realistic  
        Need for Freedom  
        Frustration Tolerance  
        Multi-Tasking  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • During times of change, she should remain positive and resilient under most difficult or uncertain circumstances.
      •   Hinders

      • Her very pragmatic orientation may lead to an overreliance on how things have been done in the past. She may not be flexible and open-minded to new approaches or ideas.

      • Her relatively high need for personal freedom may sometimes interfere with her willingness to accept changes to her work requirements or task priorities. She may resist being told what to do or be slow to adopt changes that are not to her liking.

      • She prefers predictable environments. She may not like change if it disrupts her routine.
      •  
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Planning And Organizing

        Effectively organizing and planning work according to organizational needs by defining objectives and anticipating needs and priorities.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Planning And Organizing

        Structured  
        Realistic  
        Work Organization  
        Multi-Tasking  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • When needed, she should be willing to apply a certain amount of logical and systematic thought to the planning process. Within the limitations of her abilities and education, this should help her to conceptualize the steps needed to plan work activities.

      • Strongly pragmatic by nature, she will emphasize realistic goals and the development of workable plans.
      •   Hinders

      • In her day-to-day work activities, she is likely to be disorganized.

      • Her preference for the routine and working on only a few tasks at a time may interfere with her ability to plan and organize when faced with multiple, competing demands.
      •  
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Driving For Results

        Challenging, pushing the organization and themselves to excel and achieve.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Driving For Results

        Assertiveness  
        Self-Reliance  
        Work Pace  
        Realistic  
        Follow-Through  
        Frustration Tolerance  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • Assertive and forceful, she should be able to challenge or push people to attain results.

      • Highly self-reliant, she should be comfortable establishing goals and taking personal responsibility for their achievement with little support or direction from others.

      • Practical and pragmatic by nature, she should emphasize tangible results and immediate outcomes.

      • As resilient as most people, she should be able to persist despite frustration in most situations.
      •   Hinders

      • Her slow work pace may interfere with her ability to achieve high levels of personal work output and inhibit her ability to inspire high effort levels in others.

      • Her level of follow-through may be lower than is desired. Sometimes she may not carry projects through to completion.
      • The combination of her high self-reliance but low follow-through may lead her to take on more than she will actually accomplish.

         
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Managing Others

        Directing and leading others to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Managing Others

        Assertiveness  
        Positive about People  
        Need to be Liked  
        Sociability  
        Work Pace  
        Self-Reliance  
        Optimism  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • Naturally assertive, she will enjoy the leadership role. She should be capable of being forceful and directive when necessary.

      • Socially outgoing, she should be comfortable interacting with her subordinates on a personal level.

      • Self-reliant, but not excessively so, she should be willing to do the work herself or allow subordinates to participate, as appropriate for the situation.

      • Her generally optimistic outlook should have a positive impact on the morale of her group.
      •   Hinders

      • She can be skeptical in her view of people. At times, this may lead her to be critical and faultfinding rather than positive and constructive in her interactions with subordinates.

      • Her need to be liked is low for a managerial role. At times, she may be unnecessarily disagreeable and may have difficulty fostering a cooperative work environment among those she manages.

      • Her work pace may be slower than is desired for a management role. She may not be able to consistently exert the level of personal effort needed to effectively manage people.
      • The combination of her assertive style and slow work pace may result in her being perceived as more "talk" than "do" by those she leads.

        The combination of her high assertiveness and low need to be liked suggests a very competitive nature. While this could help drive her group to high levels of achievement, it could also lead to unnecessary conflict and detract from group morale if not properly controlled.

         
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Coaching And Developing Others

        Advising, assisting, mentoring and providing feedback to others to encourage and inspire the development of work-related competencies and long-term career growth.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Coaching And Developing Others

        Positive about People  
        Need to be Liked  
        Insight  
        Need for Recognition  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • Thoughtful and perceptive, she should be able to recognize subtle differences among people. She will likely take the time to understand the particular needs and motivations of each person she coaches.

      • Personally motivated by attention and recognition, she is likely to recognize their importance to others. It is likely that she will use recognition as a motivational tool.
      •   Hinders

      • Her distrustful view of the intentions of others will likely interfere with or inhibit the type of personal relationship most appropriate in a coaching role. She may be negative in her expectations and hesitant to extend herself and support those she is to coach.

      • Her relatively low need to please and be liked by others may interfere with developing a good coaching relationship. She may not be as supportive and giving of herself as would be optimal for this role.
      • While the dimensions measured by ASSESS can address a desire or willingness to coach and develop others, they cannot evaluate whether she has the requisite knowledge and experience to truly guide someone's development in your organization. Please take special care in the interview to determine if she has knowledge and experience worth sharing.

         
        PERSONALITY DETAIL
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

         
        Motivating Others

        Inspiring others to perform well by actively conveying enthusiasm and a passion for doing a good job.

         
        Personality Implications for
        Motivating Others

        Positive about People  
        Optimism  
        Work Pace  
        Assertiveness  
         

        Comments:
        Helps

      • When trying to encourage and motivate others, her generally optimistic nature should be an asset.

      • Assertive and forceful, she should be comfortable in the role of a motivator. She should be able to self-confidently challenge people to perform, when necessary.
      •   Hinders

      • Her skeptical and mistrustful view of others will be apparent to most and will detract from her ability to inspire. She will focus more on weaknesses than strengths, and people may feel they are not trusted or expected to perform well.

      • Her lower than average energy level (work pace) may detract from her ability to generate enthusiasm and inspire high effort levels in others.

      • INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

         
        The following structured interview will guide you through a series of behaviorally based questions to help you better evaluate this candidate's ability to display each competency. It also provides additional interview suggestions based on this candidate's personality results. Take notes in the space provided and record your summary rating for each competency area.

        For additional, more detailed information on conducting good behavior-based interviews, please visit the ASSESS managers resource website at https://www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/System/Reports/www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/resources/manager.


        Interview Date: __________


        Before the Interview


        Review the Competency Model definitions and representative behaviors.

        Review the candidate's resume and be familiar with his/her background and experience.

        Review the candidate's ASSESS results.

        Review the interview questions and additional personality probes.


        During the interview, remember to:


         

        • Use open-ended questions
        • Ask probing follow-up questions
        • Focus on specific examples and behaviors
        • Postpone judgment: don't rely on your first impression


           


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

         
        BACKGROUND & HISTORY


        Start the interview by discussing the details of the candidate's educational and work history.


        Walk me through your educational background.

        Listen and probe for accomplishments, grades, how he/she chose college/major, classes he/she liked or disliked, involvement in outside activities, work experience during school, etc., and probe for how they relate to the job.

        Walk me through your work history.

        Listen and probe for milestones, accomplishments, relationships with co-workers and supervisors, tasks he/she liked or disliked, work environments he/she liked or disliked, reasons for leaving each job, etc. and probe for how prior experience has prepared him/her for this job.

        NOTES:


         


        Suggested transition to competency-oriented interview questions: "I'm now going to ask you to describe some specific situations from your past experience. For each, tell me about the situation itself, what you did specifically, and the results or outcome of your actions."


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Decisive Judgment:  Making good decisions in a timely and confident manner.

        • Describe some of the decisions you have made recently that had important effects on your business or the people involved. How did you make your decisions? How did you balance the pressures of timeliness and making the right decision? Did you change your decision after making it? Why or why not?

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about a time when you decided to use an existing solution when a new or different approach would have been better? Why did this happen? (Is there an overreliance on past solutions?)

        • Tell me about a time when you made a decision quickly, and it did not go the way you expected. What factors did you miss? (Is there too much emphasis on responsiveness at the expense of a quality decision?)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Adapting To Change:  Adapting to changing situations and restructuring tasks and priorities as changes occur within the business and organization.

        • In your current and previous jobs, have your duties been relatively constant or have they changed frequently? What would you prefer? How much change would you like to have? Describe your best work environment and your worst.

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about recent changes you have experienced at work. Were they good ideas or bad? Why? (Is there a stubborn resistance to trying new things?)

        • Tell me about a time when you felt frustrated by people making too many changes in your work requirements. What was the situation? How did you feel? What did you do? (Listen for an ability to adapt to change despite a strong need to be free from close control.)

        • Tell me about a time when you had to completely break from your normal way of doing something because of a change. What happened and how did it affect you and your work? (Listen for a resistance to a change in routine.)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Planning And Organizing:  Effectively organizing and planning work according to organizational needs by defining objectives and anticipating needs and priorities.

        • Tell me about a successful project or initiative that you had responsibility for planning and organizing. What did you do? Why was this project successful?

        • Tell me about a project where you had responsibility for planning and organizing that did not go as smoothly. What did you do? What could you have done better?

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Describe a situation that illustrates the kind of techniques that you use to stay organized and focused in your own work. (Listen for an ability to keep work organized.)

        • Tell me about a time when you had to coordinate and manage several projects at once. What was challenging? How did you prioritize? How successful were you? (Listen for difficulty juggling multiple tasks at once.)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Driving For Results:  Challenging, pushing the organization and themselves to excel and achieve.

        • Describe a time when your group set and met an aggressive goal. What types of obstacles did you face? How did you overcome them?

        • Describe a time when your group failed to meet an aggressive goal. Why did this happen?

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about one of your projects that had an aggressive deadline for completion. How did you get it done? (Listen for an ability to accomplish things quickly.)

        • Describe two situations in which you were unable to thoroughly complete a project. What happened? Why? (Listen for an ability to follow-through on commitments.)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Managing Others:  Directing and leading others to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.

        • (If not previously covered) Give me a history of your management experience. For each step along the way, tell me what your group did, how many people you managed and how you assigned work and organized the group to get the job done.

        • Tell me how goals were set for the group and each of the individuals in the group for these situations? How did you manage people to achieve these goals?

        • How do you discipline and reward people who work for you? Give me specific examples of both.

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about your poorest performing subordinates. Why do you think they struggle? What have you done to improve their performance? (Listen for a tendency to expect others to fail.)

        • Give me several examples of positive feedback you have given to subordinates recently. Examples of negative feedback? What did you say? Why? (Was the negative feedback constructive or overly harsh?)

        • Tell me about a time when your group had a tight deadline to meet and was successful. What did you do to ensure the deadline was met? What about a time when your group missed the deadline? What did you do to try to achieve the missed deadline? (Does the candidate have the energy level to set a good example and energize the activities of others?)

        • Describe a situation where you, or others, thought you pushed your group too hard. How did it affect the group and their performance? Looking back, would you change how you handled the situation? (Listen for a tendency to be overly competitive to the detriment of group morale.)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Coaching And Developing Others:  Advising, assisting, mentoring and providing feedback to others to encourage and inspire the development of work-related competencies and long-term career growth.

        • Tell me about a time when you successfully helped develop or coach an individual to reach their potential. What was the situation? What did you do? What difficulties did you overcome to help this individual?

        • Tell me what things you have done in the past to ensure people who worked with you or for you were given the resources and opportunities to grow.

        • Describe those aspects of your experience, knowledge or background that are valuable to the development of others in your organization. What do you have to offer, and how willing are you to share this with others?

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about people you have chosen to help or coach at work. How are they different from the ones you did not or would not help? Give some specific examples. (Can he bring a positive outlook on people to a coaching situation?)

        • What is your approach to helping someone learn something you know? Use a current example to tell me what kinds of things you say or do. How have others responded to your help? (Will the candidate be willing to extend himself or herself to help others?)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Motivating Others:  Inspiring others to perform well by actively conveying enthusiasm and a passion for doing a good job.

        • Give me two examples of situations in which you have had to motivate people to perform. What were the circumstances? How would you describe your motivational style?

        • Tell me about a time when you have had to motivate people in different ways or use different methods of motivation based on the person or situation.

        Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:

        • Tell me about some of your co-workers or subordinates. Which ones are doing a good job and which ones are not? Why? What have you done or could you do to change the poor performers? (Listen for a tendency to be overly negative and faultfinding with little expectation of improvement.)

        • Describe a time when you needed to inspire others to work harder, accomplish more, in a short timeframe. How did you do this? (Can the candidate exert the extra effort when it is needed?)

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Functional Acumen*:  Having the skills, knowledge and abilities necessary to be effective in the specific functional content of a job.

        • Please describe for me how your education and training have prepared you for this job. What courses have you taken and how do they apply to this job?

        • Please describe your previous job experience and how it prepares you for the technical requirements of this job. Try to give specific examples of what you have learned and how you learned it.

        • What are you doing on an on-going basis to maintain and improve your technical skills and abilities?

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

        Integrity*:  Upholding a high standard of fairness and ethics in everyday words and actions.

        • Describe for me an ethical business dilemma that you have faced. What were the circumstances? What did you do? Why?

        • Tell me about two situations in which you have seen others be unfair or dishonest. What happened? What would you have done differently? Why?

        NOTES:  (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)


        INTERVIEW GUIDE
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection 4/15/2003

         
        Closing the Interview


        Your goal is to bring the interview smoothly to a close.

        Ensure that the candidate feels that he/she has been able to give you a complete and accurate picture of him/herself.

        Explain the next steps in the process and timeframe as appropriate.

        Thank the candidate for his/her time and close the interview.


        MAKING DECISIONS
        Suzanne Example
        General: Supervisor Selection  4/15/2003

        Good selection decisions require careful consideration of all the available information (education, training, experience, skills, abilities, personality, etc.) from as many different credible sources as possible (interviews, reference checks, background checks, ASSESS results, etc.) against a clear specification of what is needed or desired in the job.

        Use the following chart to evaluate the candidate on each of the competencies of the Model. Carefully consider each competency before making your overall judgement.

          Very strong evidence competency not present Strong evidence competency not present Some evidence competency is present Strong evidence competency is present Very strong evidence competency is present
        Decisive Judgment 1 2 3 4 5
        Adapting To Change 1 2 3 4 5
        Planning And Organizing 1 2 3 4 5
        Driving For Results 1 2 3 4 5
        Managing Others 1 2 3 4 5
        Coaching And Developing Others 1 2 3 4 5
        Motivating Others 1 2 3 4 5
        Functional Acumen* 1 2 3 4 5
        Integrity* 1 2 3 4 5
         
          Very strong evidence he/she will not perform effectively on the job Strong evidence he/she will not perform effectively on the job Some evidence he/she will perform effectively on the job Strong evidence he/she will perform effectively on the job Very strong evidence he/she will perform effectively on the job
        Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5